News
Home >>> News

Honeycomb Monolith

HoneycombMonolith

Honeycomb Monolith,Reducingthecost of VOC control in the semiconductor industry.


Theregenerativethermaloxidizer(RTO)isone of the standardpieces ofequipmentused tocontrol theemissionofvolatileorganic compounds(VOCs) inthesemiconductorindustry.Innormaloperation, anRTOremovesVOCsusinggas-phasefree-radicalreactionsofhomogeneousoxidationtoCO2 andwaterat1450ºFto1600ºF.Honeycomb Monolith

An RTO uses a regenerative heat exchangeintwoormorepackedbedsoperated with periodic flowreversals.Thebeds,filledwithaninert ceramic media, areconnectedbyacombustionchamberwhereone or more fuel burnersareinstalledforsystemstartup, andtomaintain necessarytemperatureatlowconcentrationsof VOCs.TheVOC-laden air enters theoxidizeratlowtemperature andisheatedthrough the heat exchangerwiththeinletceramic beds.Thisairstream then reacts inthecombustionchamberand returnsheattothe outlet beds, where itisabsorbed forthe nextcycle.Uponflowreversal, the bedfunctionschange suchthatasubstantialfractionof energy from VOCcombustionandburnerfiringisregenerated inthe upper fraction of thebeds.Amplesurfaceareaofceramicmaterial results in highthermalefficiencyachievingupto95percent in well-designedsystems.

Despite the high degree ofenergyregeneration,RTOscanstillrequirehigh fuel consumption –especiallyathighairflowrates.This isparticularly trueinthesemiconductorindustry,wherelarge volumesof airatlow-VOCconcentrations arethe norm.Analternative tothermaloxidationis acatalytic processthatoccursat lowertemperatures –600°F to900°F.As a resultoftransitionto aregenerativecatalyticoxidizer(RCO),fuelconsumption canbedramatically reduced,and inmanysituationstheinvestment inacatalyst is returned in averyshortperiod oftimedue to thefuelsavings.


Figure 1: Catalyst testing results. Test conditions: catalyst temperature 750 ºF, 2500 ppm of propane and 50 ppm of Si(CH3)4 mixed with air in inlet gas.


Semiconductor case study

Figures 2a and 2b show the top layers of ceramic media before catalyst loading in 2005. Figure 2a: Top bed in one of the canisters
Honeycomb Monolith
The conversion of an RTO at a large semiconductor facility inTexas demonstrates that some VOC control challenges for thatindustry can be overcome.

A key element of the technology wasasilicon-resistantcatalyst,which was able to withstand poisoningbysilicon-organiccompoundspresent in the exhaust. Also, prior tothecatalystloading, thefacility implemented a series ofmodificationsinexhaust enclosureand distribution to removethesilicon-containingcompoundsintegral to processingsemiconductorsfrom the treatedstream. Thecatalytic oxidizer hadbeen operated formore than fouryears at900°F to 950°F in acombustion chamber,compared to theoriginaloperating temperature1,500°F. Temperaturereductionresulted insubstantial fuel savings.The exhaustenclosuremodification,combined with the RTO conversionto an RCO,alsoavoided bedplugging by silicon that occurred in theRTO beforetheconversion. Silicon-resistant catalyst

While the addition of catalysts to RTOs has beenanacceptedpracticefor several years, it has not been a viableoptionforthesemiconductor industry. Exhaustfromsemiconductormanufacturingoperations containssilicon-organiccompounds such asthehexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)commonly used infabrication asanadhesion promoter on the wafersurface. In atypical RTO, theHMDSwould oxidize in the combustionchamber andformSiO2compounds. These so-called "sand"particleswouldbuild up overtime in the unit, and result in pluggingtheceramicmedia,channeling of the air flow, and increasingpressuredropacross thebeds (see Figure 2).


Figure 2b: Single monolith plugged fromitstop.
Honeycomb Monolith
Inan RCO, when a volatile molecule containing silicon atom(s)reactswith the catalyst surface, a practically unbreakable bond iscreatedbetween the active surface site and the silicon atom,inhibiting anycatalytic activity of that site. Deactivation bysilicon is referredto as masking. It is especially harmful forcommon platinum-metalVOC oxidation catalysts, containingrelatively few, albeit veryactive catalytic sites. Another type,the so-called "transition" or"base-metal" catalyst, contains a feworders of magnitude greaternumber of active sites, and thuspresents a good opportunity fortreatment of gases laden withsilicon-containing VOCs.

Several base-metal catalysts were synthesized andtestedinsimulatedreactions of VOC oxidation under theinfluenceofsilicon-containingorganics. Figure 1showstimedependencies for catalystactivity during propane oxidationinthepresence of 50 ppm oftetramethylsilane. The testswereperformedin a laboratory reactorwith intense internal gasmixingthatyielded the reaction rate data.Relative activity inthechartordinate was calculated as a ratiobetween runningandinitialrates of oxidation. Two noble metalcatalyst samplesweretestedalong with the base metalcatalysts.


Sample1inFigure 1 represents a common wash-coated noblemetalcatalystwithactive metals distributed over a thin filmofporousaluminadeposited on a non-porous ceramic carrier.Anothernoblemetalcatalyst, Sample 2 in Figure 1, was obtainedbyimpregnationamassive highly porous alumina carrier withnoblemetalsolutions.The base metal catalysts tested in Figure1includedmanganeseoxide and copper-chromite catalysts,bothobtainedthroughextrusion of mixes of aluminum hydroxide andbasemetaloxides,followed by subsequent drying andthermaltreatment.

Although the impregnated noble metal catalyst(Sample2)demonstratedhigher stability than wash-coated (Sample1),bothnoble metalcatalysts deactivate very quickly compared tothebasemetalcatalysts. The copper chromium catalyst showedthelowestrate ofdeactivation among all tested samples.

Aside from the VOC oxidation rate measurements,thetestsincludedcontinuous measurements of inlet andoutletconcentrationsoftetramethylsilane, thus it was possibletocalculatetheaccumulation of silicon over the catalyst.Table1presentsthe silicon accumulations over differentcatalystsamples,at whichthe reaction rate of VOC oxidation wasdecreased by30percentcompared to the initial rate. This decreasewasnotconsidered highbecause the rate of reaction couldbeincreasedagain to theinitial level through amoderatetemperatureincrease.

The base-metal catalysts can trap a considerablyhigheramountofsilicon than the noble metals (see the comparison inTable1).Themost resilient copper-chromium catalyst canabsorb0.4lbs/ft3without substantial decrease in activity.Theexperimentaldatasimilar to that shown in Figure 1 was usedforpredictingcatalystperformance based on informationaboutconcentrationofsilicon-containing organics in actualexhauststream.




RTOretrofit design and installation

Intheinitialstage of the project it was understood thatthecatalyticoperationwould prevent bed plugging due toloweroperatingtemperature. Also,the facility made concertedefforts toremove HMDSfrom the exhauststream in order to minimizesilicaformation in theoxidizer. This wasan additional incentivefor theRTO conversion.The catalyst lifetimewas estimated at fourto fiveyears, based onprocess gas propertiesand catalysttesting.

The copper-chromium catalyst recommended for RTO loading–suppliedbyMatros Technologies Inc., Chesterfield, Mo.,wasproduced byextrusionand shaped as Raschig rings (seeFigure3) havingboth diameterand length of 15 mm. This shapewascompatible withthe monolithpacking at linear velocities appliedinthe RTO. Itwas determinedthat adding the catalyst wouldnotincrease the bedpressure drop, butrather decrease it becauseofreduced actualvolume of air through thebed at loweroperatingtemperature.Pressure drop reductioncontributed tooperating costsavings asidefrom the reduction infuelconsumption.

Prior to the catalyst installation, the plugged upperlayerofceramicmonoliths was removed and the remaining bedwascleanedfrom above inevery RTO canister. A bulk ceramic mediawasplacedover the remaining3-foot bed depth of the monolith.Thecatalystbed, at a depth of 8inches, was placed abovetheadditional bulkmedia. In addition, athin layer (3 to 4 inches)ofthe ceramicmedia was loaded above thecatalyst to protect itfromradiant heatemitted by the burner.

It took two days to load the ceramic media,thecatalystandprotective ceramics, and reseal theoxidizerchambers.Anadditional thermocouple was installed in one ofthecatalystbeds.The control system modification includedreducingtheset-pointtemperature in the combustion chamber from1,500°Fto950°F, andsetting the maximum allowable operatingtemperatureto1,200°F; attemperatures above 1,200°F the copperchromiumcatalystwould beginto break down and the catalytic actionwouldcease. Theoxidizerwas heated up and put into operation twodaysafter thecatalystloading.

The original burners were designed for hightemperaturesandneededadjustments to operate at lower temperatures.


honeycomb monolith

Retrofitted unit performance

Figure 3: CatalystappliedforRTOretrofit
Ageneraloperatingstrategy for oxidizer control can involvegradualorstepwisetemperature increase with increase insiliconaccumulationover thecatalyst. The higher temperatureimproves thecatalystactivity, thusreducing the effect of siliconpoisoning.Anotherstrategy is tomaintain a fixed operatingtemperatureduring most ofthe catalyst'slifetime. This temperatureis suchthat the systemwill have asufficient reserve in theactivity forachieving highdestructionefficiency while thecatalyst graduallydeactivates. Thecatalystactivity isperiodically monitored (atleast annually) usingcatalystsampletesting and field emissiontests. The test resultsdetermine ifthetemperature should beincreased to compensate forcontinuoussilicondeactivation.Regular annual testing allows theoperationsteam toproject thetime that the catalyst should bereplaced. Oncethecatalyst beginsto lose its effectiveness,theoperatingtemperatures will need tobe increased to improvethereactionrates, and fuel costs willincrease. To avoidtoo-highfuelexpenditures, or prevent possibleloss of bedmechanicalstrengthdue to high operating temperature,the catalystshouldbereplaced.

Initial performance testing of the retrofittedunitdemonstratedthedestruction removal efficiency of VOCs at morethan99 percent,at apressure drop slightly lower than in theoriginalRTO.Theconcentration of methane was subtracted fromtheconcentrationoftotal hydrocarbons during the testing.

The retrofitted RTO has operated for about four yearswithnochangein the temperature set point andpressuredrop.Performancemonitoring included the oxidizer emissionandcatalystactivitytesting. Most recent field test confirmedthesystemperformance atmore than 97-percent destructionefficiency.Thecatalyst activitytests showed a moderate activitydecrease inlinewith the expectedsilicon accumulation andpoisoning.

The actual fuel consumption in the original andretrofittedunitswasestimated based on the measured temperatures,VOC loadingsandflowrates. The method of estimations was based onaheatbalanceaccounting for energy spent for heating theprocessgasandcombustion air, and useful heat from VOC oxidation.Theamountofthe combustion air and fuel were assumed to beequaltothedifference between outlet and inlet gas flowrates.Theestimationshowed that the retrofitted RTO decreasedtotalfuelconsumption bytwo thirds, or as much as 15,000 MCF ayear.Thesystem alsoprovided a noticeable reduction in materialandlaborcost forfrequent ceramic bed replacement and disposal.

Installation of the catalyst made it possible tocombinethelowtemperature of catalytic oxidation with thehighthermalefficiencyof regenerative heat exchange. This changehadthreeprimaryenvironmental benefits:

1. Due to the much lower oxidation temperature, 700°Fto900°F,theRCO operates using 50- to 60-percent lessfuel,andgenerates40-percent less NOX.

2. Due to the nature of the catalyst, a packing moreresilienttoHMDSresulted, thus maintaining high destructionefficiencymuchlonger,improving energy recuperation,andreducingCO2emissions.

3. A reduced volume of packing material for disposal.HoneycombMonolith

Best results and longer operating periods wereobtainedwiththereduction of silicon-containing compounds in theVOCstream.Thelesson learned: every effort should be madetominimizeoreliminate HMDS, and to maintain thehighestoperatingefficienciesin any thermaloxidationsystem.PE


 
John D. Miller
j-miller4@ti.com
JohnD.Milleris project manager, Texas Instruments Inc.,Dallas. He canbereachedby e-mail at j-miller4@ti.com orcall(214)882-4166.

Tina
Gilliland
t-gilliland@ti.com
TinaGillilandisair-permitting manager at TexasInstruments;e-mailt-gilliland@ti.comor call (972)927-3022.

GrigoriA.
Bunimovich
grigorii@matrostech.com
GrigoriA.Bunimovichis director of catalyst applications,MatrosTechnologiesInc.,Chesterfield, Mo.; e-mailgrigorii@matrostech.comor call(314)439-9921.

YuriiSh.
Matros
yurii@matrostech.com
Yurii Sh. Matros is president of Matros TechnologiesInc.;e-mail:yurii@matrostech.com orcall(314)439-9699.

 

赣公网安备 36030202000199号